<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BruteForceBlocker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danger.rulez.sk/index.php/bruteforceblocker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danger.rulez.sk</link>
	<description>Yet another FreeBSD committer's homepage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:41:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danger</title>
		<link>http://danger.rulez.sk/index.php/bruteforceblocker/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>danger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danger.rulez.sk/?page_id=5#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Hi stewe,

bruteforceblocker is available in ports too. As of the advantages, I don&#039;t really know as I have never used denyhosts before. You should check each one&#039;s features and decide yourself. BFB needs perl to run, while denyhosts seems to require python. Both thools seem to be providing exeternal database with denied clients. Note, that you can use BFB to protect other services as well (you only need to add new regexps to the script and modify syslog.conf appropriately).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi stewe,</p>
<p>bruteforceblocker is available in ports too. As of the advantages, I don&#8217;t really know as I have never used denyhosts before. You should check each one&#8217;s features and decide yourself. BFB needs perl to run, while denyhosts seems to require python. Both thools seem to be providing exeternal database with denied clients. Note, that you can use BFB to protect other services as well (you only need to add new regexps to the script and modify syslog.conf appropriately).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewe</title>
		<link>http://danger.rulez.sk/index.php/bruteforceblocker/comment-page-1/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>stewe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danger.rulez.sk/?page_id=5#comment-753</guid>
		<description>Hi danger,

I would like to know, if there is some advantage of using such a software, where denyhosts is available in ports. Will I profit from installing this?

Thank you for your answer

Have a nice day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi danger,</p>
<p>I would like to know, if there is some advantage of using such a software, where denyhosts is available in ports. Will I profit from installing this?</p>
<p>Thank you for your answer</p>
<p>Have a nice day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danger</title>
		<link>http://danger.rulez.sk/index.php/bruteforceblocker/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>danger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danger.rulez.sk/?page_id=5#comment-748</guid>
		<description>There actually is iptables compatible version (although I have never tried it), which has been ported by one of bruteforceblocker&#039;s users. You can download it from http://danger.rulez.sk/projects/bruteforceblocker/bruteforceblocker-iptables.tar.bz2 and give it a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There actually is iptables compatible version (although I have never tried it), which has been ported by one of bruteforceblocker&#8217;s users. You can download it from <a href="http://danger.rulez.sk/projects/bruteforceblocker/bruteforceblocker-iptables.tar.bz2" rel="nofollow">http://danger.rulez.sk/projects/bruteforceblocker/bruteforceblocker-iptables.tar.bz2</a> and give it a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeBSD/linux user</title>
		<link>http://danger.rulez.sk/index.php/bruteforceblocker/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeBSD/linux user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 23:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danger.rulez.sk/?page_id=5#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Excellent utility.. My servers are mainly Debian Linux these days and if you think it&#039;d be useful I&#039;d be happy to make an IPtables/IPchains compatible version.

Thanks for the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent utility.. My servers are mainly Debian Linux these days and if you think it&#8217;d be useful I&#8217;d be happy to make an IPtables/IPchains compatible version.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
